Laptop-style point-of-care ultrasound machines in the multiplace hyperbaric oxygen treatment chamber
Laptop-style point-of-care ultrasound machines in the multiplace hyperbaric oxygen treatment chamber
Description
ABSTRACT
Thacker J, Pullis M, Masters T, Logue C. Laptop-style point-of-care ultrasound machines in the
multiplace hyperbaric oxygen treatment chamber. Undersea Hyperb Med. 2026 First Quarter;
53(1):51-58.
Introduction: Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) has diverse uses in the critical care hyperbaric (HBO2)
environment. The use of electronic devices in a multiplace HBO2 chamber has traditionally been limited
secondary to fire risk.
Methods: The primary outcome was to assess the feasibility of modern laptop-style POCUS machines
in a multiplace HBO2 chamber. A secondary aim was to assess the reliability of POCUS images obtained
at different pressures in a human subject in a multiplace chamber. Testing was initially conducted with
one older machine (Sonosite 180 and Sonosite Micromaxx). Subsequently, two newer machines were
studied (Sonosite Edge II and Mindray M9). Machine and transducer reliability were tested by performing
a battery of POCUS imaging sequences: cardiac, FAST, inferior vena cava, and thoracic. The POCUS cardiac
sequences evaluated included 2D, color Doppler, and M-mode.
Results: Regarding feasibility, all machines functioned well at all depths/pressures. No instances of fire
or spark were observed. No surface temperatures above 1200F were recorded. Regarding reliability, all
machines performed adequately and completed the entire imaging sequence.
Discussion: This study demonstrates the HBO2 chamber safety of four laptop-style POCUS machines:
Sonosite 180, Sonosite Micromaxx, Sonosite Edge II, and the Mindray M9. Our results also demonstrate
excellent functionality of the newer Sonosite Edge II and Mindray machines. Secondarily, the reliability of
POCUS images obtained at different pressures in a human subject has been verified.
Keywords: Critical care; hyperbaric oxygen treatment; pressure; ultrasound
DOI: 10.22462/842
